Mapeamento das capacidades de pesquisa sobre a Mata Atlântica no Brasil: estudo bibliométrico e cientométrico

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Abstract

The general objective of this study is to map research capacities in Brazil on the Atlantic Forest. Specific objectives include to identify and characterize the scientific production, identify Graduate Programs and Research Groups involved with research on the Atlantic Forest and characterize them, describing their concentration areas and research lines. A bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on the Atlantic Forest was carried out based on data collected from the SciELO database and from the Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. Next, a scientometric analysis of the Graduate Programs and Research Groups was performed, based on data collected from the Sucupira Platform and the Directory of Research Groups. Scientific production in articles, theses and dissertations has grown consistently since the 2000s. A consistent core of research capacities has been identified, made up of institutions and researchers that focus primarily on the broad area of ​​Biological Sciences and mostly work on institutions located in the southeastern region of Brazil. There has been an expressive growth of graduate programs, concentration areas and research lines focused on the Atlantic Forest in Brazil, with important research capacities in topics more directly related to the biome, such as Ecology and Biodiversity, but also in other areas. Furthermore, research capacities on the Atlantic Forest were also identified in the Research Groups, mainly concentrated in Biological Sciences (Ecology, Zoology, Botany), but also in Exact and Earth Sciences (Chemistry, Geosciences) and Agrarian Sciences (Agronomy).

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Autores
Biografia
PhD Alejandro Caballero Rivero, National Institute of the Atlantic Forest

Doutor em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE). Bolsista pesquisador no Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica (INMA) – Santa Teresa – ES.

PhD Juliana Lazzarotto Freitas, National Institute of the Atlantic Forest

Doutora em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP/Marília). Pesquisadora no Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica (INMA) – Santa Teresa – ES.

PhD Raimundo Nonato Macedo dos Santos, Federal University of Pernambuco

Doutor em Information Stratégique et Critique Veille Technol da Universidade Paul Cézanne Aix Marseille III (AMU). Professor Associado da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) – Recife – PE.

PhD Fábio Mascarenhas e Silva, Federal University of Pernambuco

Doutor em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Professor Titular da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) – Recife – PE.

Referências

BEAUDOIN, C.; MISTRY, I.; YOUNG, N. Collaborative knowledge mapping to inform environmental policy-making: the case of canada’s rideau canal national historic site. Environmental Science and Policy, Amsterdam, v. 128, p. 229-309, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.001.
BENAVENT, R. A. et al. Trends in global research in deforestation. A bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, Amsterdam, v. 72, p. 293-302, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.060.
BORNMANN, L.; HAUNSCHILD, R.; MUTZ, R. Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, Berlin, v. 8, n. 224, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00903-w.
BRASIL. Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica (INMA). Brasília, DF: MCTI, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/composicao/rede-mcti/instituto-nacional-de-mata-atlantica. Acesso em: 1 de out. 2022.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 8 out. 2022.
BRASIL. Lei nº 11.284, de 2 de março de 2006. Dispõe sobre a gestão de florestas públicas para a produção sustentável; institui, na estrutura do Ministério do Meio Ambiente, o Serviço Florestal Brasileiro - SFB; cria o Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento Florestal - FNDF; altera as Leis nºs 10.683, de 28 de maio de 2003, 5.868, de 12 de dezembro de 1972, 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998, 4.771, de 15 de setembro de 1965, 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981, e 6.015, de 31 de dezembro de 1973; e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11284.htm. Acesso em: 9 out. 2022.
CARLUCCI, M. B.; SILVA, V. M.; TOREZAN, J. M. The southern atlantic forest: use, degradation, and perspectives for conservation. In: MARQUES, M. C. M.; GRELLE, C. E.V. (eds.). The Atlantic forest: history, biodiversity, threats and opportunities of the mega-diverse forest. Cham: Springer Nature, 2021. p. 91-111.
CAPARLAR, C. Ö.; DÖNMEZ, A. What is scientific research and how can it be done? Turkish Journal of Anesthesiology Reanimation, Istanbul, v. 44, n. 4, p. 212-218, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152%2FTJAR.2016.34711.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DA RESERVA DA BIOSFERA DA MATA ATLÂNTICA (CN-RBMA). Mata Atlântica: ciência, conservação e políticas. In: WORKSHOP CIENTÍFICO SOBRE A MATA ATLÂNTICA, 1996, Belo Horizonte. Anais […]. Belo Horizonte: CN-RBMA, 1999. Disponível em: https://acervo.socioambiental.org/sites/default/files/documents/13D00032.pdf. Acesso em: 8 out. 2022.
CORRÊA, F. A reserva da biosfera da Mata Atlântica. Consórcio Mata Atlântica & Conselho Nacional da Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica. São Paulo: CN-RBMA, 1995. (Caderno 2). Disponível em: http://www.rbma.org.br/rbma/pdf/Caderno_02.pdf. Acesso em: 8 out. 2022.
CHEN, C. Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, Warsaw, v. 2, n. 2, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006.
CONWAY, S.; STEWARD, F. Mapping innovation networks. International Journal of Innovation Management, Toh Tuck Link, v. 2, n. 2, p. 223-254, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919698000110.
DEFRIES, R.; NAGENDRA, H. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science, Washington DC, v. 356, n. 6335, p. 265-270, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1950.
FIGGE, L.; OEBELS, K.; OFFERMANS, A. The Globalization Timeline. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Berlin, v. 19, p. 863-876, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8.
FIGUEIREDO, M. S. L. et al. Tetrapod Diversity in the Atlantic Forest: Maps and Gaps. In: MARQUES, M. C. M.; GRELLE, C. E.V. (eds.). The Atlantic forest: history, biodiversity, threats and opportunities of the mega-diverse forest. Cham: Springer Nature, 2021. p. 185-204.
FREITAS, J. L.; SILVA, F.M. A pesquisa sobre a Mata Atlântica no Estado do Espírito Santo: instituições produtoras e financiadoras (1994-2020). In: ENCONTRO BRASILEIRO DE BIBLIOMETRIA E CIENTOMETRIA, 8., 2022, Maceió. Anais Eletrônicos […]. Maceió: Universidade Federal de Alagoas, 2022. Disponível em: https://ebbc.inf.br/ojs/index.php/ebbc/article/view/53/6. Acesso em: 17 out. 2022.
FREITAS, J. L.F.; SOBRAL, N. V.; SILVA, F. M. Indicadores de coautoria nas publicações sobre a Mata Atlântica: análise bibliométrica na Web of Science. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 21., 2021, Rio de Janeiro. Anais […]. Rio de Janeiro: Ibict; UFRJ, 2021.
FUNDAÇÃO SOS MATA ATLÂNTICA (SOSMA). Mata Atlântica. Itu: SOSMA, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.sosma.org.br/causas/mata-atlantica. Acesso em: 17 out. 2022.
GARNETT, S. T.; HAYDON, J. Mapping research capacity in north-western tropical Australia. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, Toh Tuck Link, v. 4. n. 3, p. 141-156, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649205001122.
GLÄSER, J.; LAUDEL, G. Governing science. European Journal of Sociology, Cambridge, v. 57, n. 1, p. 117-168, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975616000047.
GODINHO, M. M.; MENDONÇA, S. F.; PEREIRA, T. S. Managing innovation systems: a framework for mapping strengths and weaknesses. In: THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “ECONOMIC POLICIES IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM”, 2004, Coimbra. Proceedings […]. Coimbra: University of Coimbra, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/1547718/Managing_Innovation_Systems_A_Framework_for_Mapping_Strengths_and_Weaknesses. Acesso em: 2 out. 2022.
GUAN, Y.; KANG, R.; LIU, J. Evolution of the field of ecological restoration over the last three decades: a bibliometric analysis. Restoration Ecology, Hoboken, v. 27, n. 3, p. 647-660, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12899.
GUERRA, A. et al. Ecological restoration in Brazilian biomes: identifying advances and gaps. Forest Ecology and Management, Amsterdam, v. 458, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117802.
GLOBAL FORUM OF HEALTH RESEARCH. The 10/90 report on health research. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000. Disponível em: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/20413/10.90.FULLTEXT.pdf. Acesso em: 2 out. 2022.
HICKS, D.; WANG, J. Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities. London: School of School of Public Policy, 2009. Disponível em: https://globalhighered.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/esf_report_final_100309.pdf. Acesso em: 3 out. 2022.
HOOD, W. W.; WILSON, C. S. The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics. Scientometrics, Berlin, v. 52, n. 2, p. 291-314, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342.
HUGÉ, J. et al. Mapping research gaps for sustainable forest management based on the nominal group technique. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Berlin, v. 24, n. 6, p. 10101-10121, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02478-1
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). Biomas. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/cartas-e-mapas/informacoes-ambientais/15842-biomas.html?=&t=downloads. Acesso em 17 out. 2022.
LESSA, T. et al. Known unknowns: filling the gaps in scientific knowledge production in the Caatinga. PLOS ONE, San Francisco, v. 14, n. 7, e0219359, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219359.
LUIZ, A. V. A. et al. Impacto da Covid-19 em alunos de pós-graduação. Olhares & Trilhas, Uberlândia, v. 23, n. 2, p. 538-554, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14393/OT2021v23.n.2.60117.
MALHI, Y. et al. Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, London, v. 375, p. 1-8, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0104
MARQUES, M. C. M. et al. The Atlantic Forest: An Introduction to the Megadiverse Forest of South America. In: MARQUES, M. C. M.; GRELLE, C. E.V. (eds.). The Atlantic forest: history, biodiversity, threats and opportunities of the mega-diverse forest. Cham: Springer Nature, 2021. p. 3-23.
MOURA, A. M. M. Trajetória da política ambiental federal no Brasil. In: MOURA, A. M. M. (org.). Governança ambiental no Brasil: instituições, atores e políticas públicas. Brasília: IPEA, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/livros/livros/160719_governanca_ambiental.pdf . Acesso em: 9 out. 2022.
NARDI, P. et al. Structure and evolution of mediterranean forest research: a science mapping approach. PLOS ONE, San Francisco, v. 11, n. 5, e0155016, 2016. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155016.
PULFORD, J. et al. Measuring the outcome and impact of research capacity strengthening initiatives: a review of indicators used and described in the published and grey literature. F1000Res, London, v. 9. p. 1-19, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24144.1
ROMANELLI, J. P. et al. Assessing ecological restoration as a research topic using bibliometric indicators. Ecological Engineering, Amsterdam, v. 120, p. 311-320, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.06.015.
SANTOS, J. G. et al. Geographic trends and information deficits in Amazonian conservation research. Biodiversity and Conservation, Berlin, v. 24, n. 11, p. 2853-2863, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0981-x.
SÃO PAULO. Análise da produção científica a partir de indicadores bibliométricos. In: FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO (Fapesp). Indicadores de ciência, tecnologia e inovação em São Paulo 2010. São Paulo: Fapesp, 2011. (Capítulo 4). Disponível em: http://www.fapesp.br/indicadores/2010/volume1/cap4.pdf. Acesso em: 3 out. 2022.
SCIENTIFIC ELETRONIC LIBRARY ONLINE (SciELO). Critérios, política e procedimentos para a admissão e a permanência de periódicos na Coleção SciELO Brasil. São Paulo: Scielo, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/media/files/20220900-criterios-scielo-brasil.pdf. Acesso em: 20 out. 2022.
SIDONE, O. J. G.; HADDAD, E. A.; MENA-CHALCO, J. A ciência nas regiões brasileiras: evolução da produção e das redes de colaboração científica. Transinformação, Campinas, v. 28, n. 1, p. 15-31, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016002800002.
SILVA, T. C. et al. Non-Timber forest products in Brazil: a bibliometric and a state-of-the-art review. Sustainability, Basel, v. 12, n. 17, p. 1-24, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177151.
SPINAK, E. Indicadores cienciométricos. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, DF, v. 27, n. 2, p. 141-148., 1998. Disponível em: http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/795/826. Acesso em: 3 out. 2022.
SUTHERLAND, W. et al. A 2018 horizon scan of emerging issues for global conservation and biological diversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Philadelphia, v. 33, n. 1, p. 47-58, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.006.
TALAMINI, E. et al. Tendências e perspectivas do Novo Paradigma Ecológico: uma revisão sistemática da produção científica. Sustentabilidade em Debate, Brasília, v.8, n. 3, p. 84-99, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v8n3.2017.24656.
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM (UNEP); WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (WCSC). Biodiversity-related capacity building. Nairóbi: UNEP; WCSC, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.cbd.int/cb/forums/strategic-framework/final-report-study.pdf. Acesso em: 1 out. 2022.
VAN LEEUWEN, T. The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, v. 66, n. 1, p. 133-154, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0010-7.
THE WORLD BANK (WB). World Bank Data: Brazil. Washington, DC: WB, [2017]. Disponível em: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=BR. Acesso em: 1 out. 2022.
ZUPO, T. et al. Trends and knowledge gaps on ecological restoration research in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restoration Ecology, Hoboken, v. 30, n. 2, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13645.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##


How to Cite

CABALLERO RIVERO, A.; LAZZAROTTO FREITAS, J.; MACEDO DOS SANTOS; SILVA, F. M. e. Mapeamento das capacidades de pesquisa sobre a Mata Atlântica no Brasil:: estudo bibliométrico e cientométrico. Brazilian Journal of Graduate Studies, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 40, p. 1–33, 2025. DOI: 10.21713/rbpg.v19i40.2077. Disponível em: https://rbpg.capes.gov.br/rbpg/article/view/2077. Acesso em: 5 apr. 2025.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 40 (2024): edição 40

Section

Artigos

Published:

Feb 27, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21713/rbpg.v19i40.2077
Keywords:

Mapeamento, Capacidades de pesquisa, Mata Atlântica, Brasil Mapeo, Capacidades de investigación, Bosque Atlántico, Brasil Mapping, Research capacities, Atlantic forest, Brazil

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.