Teaching, research and extension in cellular animal science in the Federal University of Parana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21713/rbpg.v42.2399Keywords:
Cellular agriculture, Education, LaboratoryAbstract
The rise of the global population in the next decades coupled with the meatification of diets in Asia and Africa will drive a substantial increase in global demand for meat. This raises significant concerns regarding animal welfare, public health, food security and the sustainability of conventional animal production. Cellular animal science offers promising response to such challenges. Training skilled professionals in cellular agriculture is essential to support its development and integration. This study outlines the implementation process of Cellular Animal Science at the Federal University of Parana (UFPR), including the development of the first courses in Introduction to Cellular Animal Science at both graduate and undergraduate levels and the establishment of the Cellular Animal Science Laboratory (Zoocel). Additionally, the extension project Bife Sem Bicho was conceptualized to propagate knowledge about cultivated animal products and other alternative proteins, engaging both university audiences and the public. Our findings indicate that UFPR has made significant advancement in the cellular animal science field by establishing foundational courses, a dedicated laboratory, and outreach initiatives. The study reveals strong student demand for hands-on training in alternative protein production systems, underscoring the importance of further laboratory developments for teaching. Additionally, the integration of research, teaching, and outreach activities has promoted scientific knowledge and increased student interest in cellular agriculture, highlighting the potential of this model to train qualified professionals and expand awareness of and skills in sustainable food production systems alternatives to intensive animal production.
References
ABRAHAO, Ana Flavia S. et al. Cultivated manatee meat aiding Amazon biodiversity conservation: discussing a proposed model. Conservation, v. 3, n. 2, p. 303-318, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation3020021.
AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNCIA SANITÁRIA. Anvisa atualiza regras para comprovar segurança de novos alimentos e ingredientes. [Brasília, DF]: Anvisa, 20 Dec. 2023. Available from: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/noticias-anvisa/2023/anvisa-atualiza-regras-para-comprovar-seguranca-de-novos-alimentos-e-ingredientes. Accessed on: 18 June 2026.
BISCARRA-BELLIO, Jennifer C. et al. Demand changes meat as changing meat reshapes demand: The great meat revolution. Meat Science, v. 196, 109040, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.109040.
BOGUEVA, Diana et al. Will the cows and chickens come home? Perspectives of Australian and Brazilian beef and poultry farmers towards diversification. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 16, 12380, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612380.
BRYANT, Christopher; BARNETT, Julie. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: an updated review (2018–2020). Applied Sciences, v. 10, n. 15, 5201, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155201.
CABRAL, Alexandre; PEREIRA, Isabela de Oliveira; LEITOLIS, Amanda. Regulatory aspects of cultivated meat. In: SOCCOL, Carlos Ricardo et al. (ed.). Cultivated meat: technologies, commercialization and challenges. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. p. 299-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55968-6_15.
CASNICI, Cyntia Vilasboas Calixto et al. The role of NGOs in the transition towards more sustainable and innovative agri-food GVCs. In: VAN TULDER, Rob; GRØGAARD, Birgitte; LUNNAN, Randi (ed.). Walking the talk? MNEs transitioning towards a sustainable world. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2024. p. 373-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/s1745-886220240000018023.
CHAUDHARY, Ankur et al. Toward a global protein transition: urgency, potential, and international cooperation. [S. l.]: T20 Brasil, 2024. Policy brief. Available from: https://www.global-solutions-initiative.org/publication/toward-a-global-protein-transition-urgency-potential-and-international-cooperation/. Accessed on: 18 June 2026.
DUARTE, Sebastião Junior Henrique; MAMEDE, Marli Villela; ANDRADE, Sônia Maria Oliveira de. Opções teórico-metodológicas em pesquisas qualitativas: representações sociais e discurso do sujeito coletivo. Saúde e Sociedade, v. 18, n. 4, p. 620-626, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902009000400006.
GARBIN, Vivien Patrícia et al. Ética animal e proteínas alternativas: questões atuais em terminologia da língua portuguesa. Archives of Veterinary Science, v. 29, n. 1, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v29i1.93963.
GÓES, Helna Almeida de Araujo; REIS, Germano Glufke; ABIB, Gustavo. When stakeholder theory meets justification theory: an intersection proposal. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 19, n. 4, p. 901-917, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200179.
GÓES, Helna Almeida de Araujo; ZENY, Giovanna Colin; REIS, Germano Glufke. When justification theory meets responsible innovation: a study of cell-based meat. Science, Technology and Society, v. 27, n. 2, p. 256-273, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218221075158.
GÓES, Helna Almeida de Araujo et al. Stakeholders’ justifications in innovation: the case of cell-based meat. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1781-1806, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2352744.
GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE BRASIL. Plano de ensino para disciplinas em proteínas alternativas: modelo conceitual. [S. l.]: GFI Brasil, [2023]. Available from: https://gfi.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Plano-de-Ensino-para-Disciplinas-em-Proteinas-Alternativas-Modelo-Conceitual.pdf. Accessed on: 8 Oct. 2026.
GOODWIN, J. N.; SHOULDERS, C. W. The future of meat: A qualitative analysis of cultured meat media coverage. Meat Science, v. 95, n. 3, p. 445-450, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.027.
HANSEN, Arve; SYSE, Karen Lykke (ed.). Changing meat cultures: food practices, global capitalism, and the consumption of animals. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021. Available from: https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9798881851569_A63010518/preview-9798881851569_A63010518.pdf. Accessed on: 8 Oct. 2026.
HEIDEMANN, Marina Sucha et al. Critical perspective of animal production specialists on cell-based meat in Brazil: from bottleneck to best scenarios. Animals, v. 10, n. 9, 1678, 2020a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091678.
HEIDEMANN, Marina Sucha et al. Uncoupling meat from animal slaughter and its impacts on human-animal relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, 1824, 2020b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01824.
KIRSCH, Marline; MORALES‐DALMAU, Jordi; LAVRENTIEVA, Antonina. Cultivated meat manufacturing: technology, trends, and challenges. Engineering in Life Sciences, v. 23, n. 12, e2300227, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202300227.
LETTI, Luiz Alberto Junior et al. Cultivated meat: recent technological developments, current market and future challenges. Biotechnology Research and Innovation, v. 5, n. 1, e2021001, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/biori.202101.
MENDES, Gabriel et al. How much do opinions regarding cultivated meat vary within the same country? The cases of São Paulo and Salvador, Brazil. PLOS ONE, v. 20, n. 2, e0317956, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317956.
MORAIS-DA-SILVA, Rodrigo Luiz et al. The animal stance in the socio-technical transition to sustainability: the case of cultivated meat. In: EGOS COLLOQUIUM, 37., 2021, Amsterdam. Proceedings […]. [S. l.]: European Group for Organizational Studies, 2021. p. 1-20. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351558097_The_animal_stance_in_the_socio-technical_transition_to_sustainability_The_case_of_cultivated_meat. Accessed on: 8 Oct. 2026.
MORAIS-DA-SILVA, Rodrigo Luiz et al. The expected impact of cultivated and plant-based meats on jobs: the views of experts from Brazil, the United States and Europe. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, v. 9, n. 1, 297, 2022a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01316-z.
MORAIS-DA-SILVA, Rodrigo Luiz et al. The social impact of cultivated and plant-based meats as radical innovations in the food chain: Views from Brazil, the United States and Europe. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v. 6, 1056615, 2022b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1056615.
MORAIS-DA-SILVA, Rodrigo Luiz et al. The social impacts of a transition from conventional to cultivated and plant-based meats: Evidence from Brazil. Food Policy, v. 111, 102337, 2022c. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102337.
MOREIRA, Mirian Natali Blézins et al. Social media analysis to understand the expected benefits by plant-based meat alternatives consumers. Foods, v. 10, n. 12, 3144, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123144.
MOREIRA, Mirian Natali Blézins et al. Reducing meat consumption: Insights from a bibliometric analysis and future scopes. Future Foods, v. 5, 100120, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100120.
NEWELL, Robert; GLAROS, Alesandros. Sustainable food systems, development paths, and scenarios for cellular agriculture. In: FRASER, Evan D. G. et al. (ed.). Cellular agriculture: technology, society, sustainability and science. [London]: Academic Press, 2024. p. 29-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-18767-4.00022-6.
NEWTON, Peter et al. Price above all else: an analysis of expert opinion on the priority actions to scale up production and consumption of plant-based meat in Brazil. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v. 8, 1303448, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1303448.
PHILLIPS, Clive Julian Christie et al. Planetary health and animal and plant dietary proteins. In: PREEDY, Victor R. (ed.). Plant and animal proteins in health and disease prevention. [S. l.]: CRC Press, 2025. p. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003597926-1.
POST, Mark J. An alternative animal protein source: cultured beef. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 1328, n. 1, p. 29-33, 2014a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12569.
POST, Mark J. Cultured beef: medical technology to produce food. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1039-1041, 2014b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6474.
REIS, Germano Glufke et al. Cell-based meat and firms’ environmental strategies: new rationales as per available literature. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 22, 9418, 2020a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229418.
REIS, Germano Glufke; MOLENTO, Carla Forte Maiolino. Emerging Market Multinationals and International Corporate Social Responsibility Standards: Bringing Animals to the Fore. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 166, n. 2, p. 351-368, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04144-5.
REIS, Germano Glufke et al. Livestock value chain in transition: Cultivated (cell-based) meat and the need for breakthrough capabilities. Technology in Society, v. 62, 101286, 2020b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101286.
REIS, Germano Glufke et al. Can radical innovation mitigate environmental and animal welfare misconduct in global value chains? The case of cell-based tuna. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 169, 120845, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120845.
REIS, Germano Glufke; MOLENTO, Carla Forte Maiolino; SOUZA, Ana Paula Oliveira. Governance and standardization in fish value chains: do they take care of key animal welfare issues? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 34, n. 5, 30, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09870-3.
REIS, Germano Glufke et al. The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystems and global value chains: Insights from the cultivated meat entrepreneurial ecosystem of Singapore. Technology in Society, v. 71, 102116, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102116.
REIS, Germano Glufke et al. David vs Goliath: The challenges for plant-based meat companies competing with animal-based meat producers. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 423, 138705, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138705.
REIS, Germano Glufke et al. Promises and uncertainties in the cultivated proteins market: Perspectives from Germany and Brazil. Food Policy, v. 131, 102820, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102820.
SCHNEIDER, Kevin. Concentrating on healthy feeding operations: the national school lunch program, “cultured meat,” and the path to a sustainable food future. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, v. 29, n. 1, p. 145-184, 2013. Available from: https://law.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/upcbnu1581/files/JLUEL/jluel-v29n1.pdf. Accessed on: 8 Oct. 2026.
SLADE, Peter. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite, v. 125, p. 428-437, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030.
SOCCOL, Carlos Ricardo et al. (ed.). Cultivated meat: technologies, commercialization and challenges. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. E-book. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55968-6.
STEPHENS, Neil; KING, Emma; LYALL, Catherine. Blood, meat, and upscaling tissue engineering: Promises, anticipated markets, and performativity in the biomedical and agri-food sectors. BioSocieties, v. 13, n. 2, p. 368-388, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-017-0072-1.
STOUT, Andrew J. et al. Education and training. In: FRASER, Evan D. G. et al. (ed.). Cellular agriculture: technology, society, sustainability and science. [London]: Academic Press, 2024. p. 487-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-18767-4.00004-4.
UNITED NATIONS. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division. World population prospects 2022: summary of results. New York: United Nations, 2022. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf. Accessed on: 8 Oct. 2026.
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME; INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE. Preventing the next pandemic: zoonotic diseases and how to break the chain of transmission. Nairobi: UNEP, 2020. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/32316. Accessed on: 8 Oct. 2026.
VALENTE, Júlia de Paula Soares et al. First glimpse on attitudes of highly educated consumers towards cell-based meat and related issues in Brazil. PLOS ONE, v. 14, n. 8, e0221129, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221129.
VERBEKE, Wim et al. ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: Consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Science, v. 102, p. 49-58, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013.
ZOOCEL. Zoocel. YouTube, 2024; YouTube channel. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/@zoocelufpr. Accessed on: 8 Oct. 2026.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Brazilian Journal of Graduate Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this magazine agree to the following terms:
- They hold the copyright on the work and grant the magazine the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows sharing the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
- They are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine, with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
- They are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or their personal website), provided that the initial publication in this magazine is mentioned, as this can generate changes.
Furthermore, authors represent that:
- All the information contained in the manuscript are facts, true, or based on empirical or scientific research.
- The use of any trademark or copyright in the manuscript has been credited to its owner or permission to use the name was duly granted.
