Gender diversity in the deans of brazilian universities career temporal evolution, production of knowledge and of human resources

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Resumo

Women are underrepresented in positions of power and leadership in higher education and the challenges faced by women in order to reach these senior positions in academia are complex and have received considerable attention in recent years. In this work, we quantify gender diversity in Brazilian academia using three types of indicators: production of knowledge, temporal evolution in the career, and training of human resources to study in detail the profile of the Deans of Research and Graduate Studies in 215 Higher Education Institutions in the year of 2019. Our analysis shows that around only 36% of positions were occupied by women, a percentage that is not consistent with the number of women professors in Brazilian higher education. Using the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development Lattes’ Platform databank, we show that men and women in dean positions publish roughly the same number of paper/scientific articles per year and present almost the same time elapsed in the career path, while women produce more human resources. The fact that women occupy only 1/3 of the positions of dean of research and graduation reveals that for women to reach the top, it is necessary that they adapt to the same metric intended for men while facing additional challenges indicating a persistent glass ceiling. 

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Autores
Biografia
Carolina Nodari, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

Mestre pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação em Ciências da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Assistente em Ciência e Tecnologia da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Brasília – DF.

Claudio Celso Soares de Oliveira, Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (Enap)

Aluno de mestrado do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Avaliação e Monitoramento de Políticas Públicas da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (Enap). Analista em Ciência e Tecnologia da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Brasília – DF.

Marcia C. Barbosa, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

Full professor. Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

Referências

ACKER, J. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, v. 4, n. 2, p. 139-158, jun., 1990. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/189609. Accessed on: 14 oct. 2023.
AHMAD, S. Family or future in the academy?. Review of Educational Research, v. 87, n. 1, p. 204-239, feb., 2017.
ARÊAS, R. Pós-graduação: impactos, desafios e oportunidades sob a luz da equidade de gênero. 2019. Tese (Doutorado em Educação em Ciências: Química da Vida e Saúde) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, 2019. Available at: https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/215333. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
ARÊAS, R.; ABREU, A.; NOBRE, C.; BARBOSA, M. C.; SANTANA, A. E. Androcentrism in the scientific field: brazilian systems of graduate studies, science and technology as a case study. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 95, p. e20211629, maio 2023. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/vD6RsbDs8frc7xBJXXbfK4y/?lang=en. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
ARÊAS, R.; BARBOSA, M. C.; SANTANA, A. E. Teorema de Emmy Nöther, 100 anos: alegoria da misoginia em ciência. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, v. 41, p. e20190017, maio, 2019. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbef/a/QMssdFcrHV33LkWhM3PL68K/. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
ARÊAS, R. P.; NODARI, C. A.; CARDOSO, M.; SANTANA, A. E.; BARBOSA, M. C. Misogyny in brazilian federal government agencies for science and high-education. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 93, p. e20201389, 3 sep. 2021. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/rCFc45xJCnFfCY9vgQ4GnfC/?lang=en. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
ARÊAS, R.; SANTANA, A. E.; BARBOSA, M. C. A discriminação da intelligentsia no campo científico brasileiro. Revista Educação, Cultura e Sociedade, v. 10, n. 3, 28 oct. 2020. DOI 10.30681/ecs.v10i3.3943. Available at: https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/recs/article/view/8684. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
ARENZON, J. J.; DUARTE, P.; CAVALCANTI, S.; BARBOSA, M. C. Women and physics in Brazil: publications, citations and H index. AIP Conference Proceedings, v. 1517, n. 1, p. 78-79, mar., 2013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4794228. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
AZEVEDO, M. L. N. de; CATANI, A. M.; HEY, A. P. Circulação das ideias e internacionalização da Educação Superior: inferências a partir da teoria dos campos de Pierre Bourdieu. Educação, [S. l.], v. 40, n. 3, p. 296-304, 2017. Available at: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/article/view/28980. Accessed on: 9 nov. 2023.
BEATTIE, L. Educational leadership: a nirvana or a battlefield? A glance into the higher education in the UK using Bourdieu. International Journal of Leadership in Education, v. 21, n. 5, p. 608-620, sep., 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1330490. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
BEIGEL, F.; ALMEIDA, A. M.; GALLARDO, O.o; et al. Scientific production and gender inequalities in two academic elites: Brazil and Argentina. Revue d’histoire des sciences humaines, n. 42, p. 255-280, 2023. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/rhsh/8374. Accessed on: 16 out. 2023.
BENDL, R.; SCHMIDT, A. From ‘Glass Ceilings’ to ‘Firewalls’- different metaphors for describing discrimination. Gender, Work & Organization, v. 17, n. 5, p. 612-634, 2010. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00520.x. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
BENSCHOP, Y.; VERLOO, M. Gender change, organizational change and gender equality strategies. In: JEANES, E. L.; KNIGHTS, D.; MARTIN, P. Y. (eds.). Handbook of gender, work and organization. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. p. 277-290.
BEZERRA, A. R. G.; STANISCUASKI, F.; BARBOSA, M. C. Brazilian research productivity fellows in physics and nursing under a gender lens: 17 years of data. Cadernos de Gênero e Tecnologia, v. 15, n. 46, p. 64, 2022. Available at: https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/cgt/article/view/15472. Accessed on: 16 oct. 2023.
BEZERRA, A. R. G.; STANISCUASKI, F.; BARBOSA, M. C. B. O perfil das mulheres bolsistas de produtividade em pesquisa do CNPq de física e enfermagem: trajetórias acadêmicas distintas. In: Anais do XIV ENPEC (to be published). Caldas Novas, Goiás.: [s.n.], 2023. Available at: https://www.if.ufrgs.br/~barbosa/Publications/Gender/bezerra-ENPEC-2023.pdf.
BIRD, S. R. Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: a case-study approach. Gender, Work & Organization, v. 18, n. 2, p. 202-230, 2011. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
BOURDIEU, P. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, v. 14, n. 6, p. 19-47, dec., 1975. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
BOURDIEU, P. Usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. trans. by Denice Barbaro Catani. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2004.
BOURDIEU, P. Homo Academicus. Trad. Ione Ribeiro Valle; Nilton Valle. 2. ed. Florianópolis, SC: Edufsc, 2019.
BRASIL. Fundação Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Número de doutoras cresce 61% em seis anos. Brasília: Capes, 2021a. Available at: https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/numero-de-doutoras-cresce-61-em-seis-anos. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
BRASIL. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Estatísticas de gênero: indicadores sociais das mulheres no Brasil. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2018. Available at: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101784. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
BRASIL. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Mulheres e homens em ocupação de DAS na administração pública federal. Brasília: Ipea, 2012. Available at: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/7745. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
BRASIL. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. Resumo técnico do Censo da Educação Superior 2019. Brasília: Inep, 2021b. Available at: https://download.inep.gov.br/publicacoes/institucionais/estatisticas_e_indicadores/resumo_tecnico_censo_da_educacao_superior_2019.pdf.
BRASIL. Ministério da Mulher, da Família e dos Direitos Humanos. Secretaria Nacional De Políticas Para As Mulheres. Relatório Anual Socioeconômico da Mulher (RASEAM) 2017/2018. Brasília: MMFDH, 2020. Available at: https://www.gov.br/mulheres/pt-br/central-de-conteudos/noticias/2023/abril/observatorio-brasil-da-igualdade-de-genero-retoma-producao-anual-do-raseam-2013-relatorio-socioeconomico-da-mulher/relatorio-anual-socioeconomico-da-mulher-2017-2018.pdf.
BRITO, C.; BARBOSA, M. C.; PAVANI, D. B.; COSTA, A. B.; NARDI, H. C. Harassment in Brazilian universities: how big is this problem? The Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) as a case study. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 94 (2), e20201720, Apr., 2022. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/gThR3Njnbx4945tDm5SfzWd/?lang=en. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
CATANI, A. M. et al. Vocabulário Bourdieu. Belo Horizonte: Editora Autêntica, 2017.
CHANCELLOR. In: MERRIAM-WEBSTER.COM Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, 2023. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dean. Accessed on: 18 oct. 2023.
CHAPPELL, L. Comparing political institutions: revealing the gendered “logic of appropriateness”. Politics & Gender, v. 2, n. 2, p. 223-235, jun., 2006. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-gender/article/abs/comparing-political-institutions-revealing-the-gendered-logic-of-appropriateness/147F5FDFA61BA824CAB6DA049DED31BE. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
CHAPPELL, L.; WAYLEN, G. Gender and the hidden life of institutions. Public Administration, v. 91, n. 3, p. 599-615, 2013. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02104.x. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
DEAN. In: MERRIAM-WEBSTER.COM Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, 2023. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dean. Accessed on: 17 oct. 2023.
DIXON-FYLE, S.; DOLAN, K.; HUNT, D. V.; PRINCE, S. Diversity wins: how inclusion matters. [S. l.]: McKinsey & Company, 2020. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/diversity-wins-how-inclusion-matters. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
DU TOIT, S. H. C.; STEYN, A. G. W.; STUMPF, R. H. Graphical exploratory data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
ELSEVIER. Gender in the global research landscape. 2017. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1083945/Elsevier-gender-report-2017.pdf.
FERRARI, N. C.; MARTELL, R.; OKIDO, D. H.; ROMANZINI, G.; MAGNAN, V.; BARBOSA, M. C.; BRITO, C. Geographic and gender diversity in the brazilian academy of sciences. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 90, p. 2543-2552, jun., 2018. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/8wVQQNCHBS9MDzyXVrd4Hnt/?lang=en. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
FIRMINO, C. R.; SILVA, F. H. E. da. Desigualdades de gênero no serviço público do Poder Executivo federal. In: PALOTTI, P.; FREIRE, A. (eds.). Servidores públicos federais: novos olhares e perspectivas. Cadernos Enap. Brasília: Enap, 2015. Available at: http://repositorio.enap.gov.br/jspui/handle/1/2563. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
GORZIZA, A.; BUONO, R. O efeito-tesoura para mulheres na ciência. Revista Piauí, São Paulo, jul., 2023. Available at: https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/o-efeito-tesoura-para-mulheres-na-ciencia/. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
HEILBORN, M. L.; RODRIGUES, C.. Gênero: breve história de um conceito. APRENDER - Caderno de Filosofia e Psicologia da Educação, n. 20, dec., 2018. Available at: https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/aprender/article/view/4547. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
HEY, A. P. Esboço de uma sociologia do campo acadêmico: a educação superior no Brasil. São Carlos: EdUFSCar; São Paulo, FAPESP, 2008.
HEY, A. P.; RODRIGUES, L. S. Elites acadêmicas: as ciências sociais na academia brasileira de ciências. Tempo Social, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 3, p. 9-33, 2017. Available at: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ts/article/view/125964. Accessed on: 9 nov. 2023.
HILL, C.; MILLER, K.; BENSON, K.; HANDLEY, G. Barriers & Bias: the status of women in leadership. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women (AAUW), 2016. Available at: https://www.aauw.org/resources/research/barrier-bias/. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
HIRATA, H. Entrevista: Helena Hirata. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, v. 17, p. e0021138, maio. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/tes/a/zzPPBSkWHqgd9xBt5jLKWSN/?lang=pt. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
HOWE-WALSH, L.; TURNBULL, S. Barriers to women leaders in academia: tales from science and technology. Studies in Higher Education, v. 41, n. 3, p. 415-428, mar., 2016. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.929102. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
HOWE-WALSH, L.; TURNBULL, S.; PAPAVASILEIOU, E.; BOZIONELOS, N. The influence of motherhood on STEM women academics’ perceptions of organizational support, mentoring and networking. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, v. 36, p. 54-63, 2016. Available at: https://awl-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/awl/article/view/21. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
HUNT, D. V.; LAYTON, D.; PRINCE, S. Why diversity matters. [S. l.]: McKinsey & Company, 2015. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/why-diversity-matters. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
KASSAMBARA, A. ggpubr: “ggplot2” based publication ready plots. 2023. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr.
LETA, J.; MARTINS, F. Docentes pesquisadores na UFRJ: o capital científico de mulheres e homens. In: Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (Inep) (ed.). Simpósio Gênero e Indicadores da Educação Superior Brasileira. Brasília: [s. n.], 2008. p. 85-101. Available at: https://download.inep.gov.br/publicacoes/diversas/temas_interdisciplinares/simposio_genero_e_indicadores_da_educacao_superior_brasileira.pdf.
LIMA, B. S. Políticas de equidade em gênero e ciências no Brasil: avanços e desafios. 2017. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Sociais) – Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, 2017. Available at: https://repositorio.unicamp.br/Acervo/Detalhe/983803. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
MCINTOSH, B.; MCQUAID, R.; MUNRO, A.; DABIR‐ALAI, P. Motherhood and its impact on career progression. Gender in Management: An International Journal, v. 27, n. 5, p. 346-364, jan., 2012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411211252651. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
MEYERSON, D. E.; KOLB, D. M. M. out of the “Armchair”: developing a framework to bridge the gap between feminist theory and practice. Organization, v. 7, n. 4, p. 553-571, nov., 2000. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840074003. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
MOSCHKOVICH, M.; ALMEIDA, A. M. F. Desigualdades de gênero na carreira acadêmica no Brasil. Dados, v. 58, p. 749-789, sep., 2015. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/dados/a/LgVhs5k7bhQNgnRyCvKBTRs/?lang=pt. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
MOSS-RACUSIN, C. A.; DOVIDIO, J. F.; BRESCOLL, V. L.; GRAHAM, M. J.; HANDELSMAN, J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 109, n. 41, p. 16474-16479, oct., 2012. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
OLIVEIRA, L. de; REICHERT, F.; ZANDONÀ, E.; SOLETTI, R. C.; STANISCUASKI, F. The 100,000 most influential scientists rank: the underrepresentation of Brazilian women in academia. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 93, p. e20201952, sep., 2021. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/D5gw9F6w76KrGFPYNGn35nF/?lang=en. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Education at a Glance 2021. [S. l.]: OECD, 2021. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/b35a14e5-en. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
PROVOST. In: MERRIAM-WEBSTER.COM Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, 2023. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/provost. Accessed on: 17 oct. 2023.
R CORE TEAM. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021. Available at: https://www.r-project.org.
RECTOR. In: MERRIAM-WEBSTER.COM Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, 2023. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rector. Accessed on: 17 oct. 2023.
ROSA, R.; CLAVERO, S. Gender equality in higher education and research. Journal of Gender Studies, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1-7, jan., 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2022.2007446. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
ROSA, R.; DREW, E.; CANAVAN, S. An overview of gender inequality in EU universities. In: DREW, E.; CANAVAN, S. (eds.). The Gender-Sensitive University. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2020. p. 1-15.
ROSS, M. B.; GLENNON, B. M.; MURCIANO-GOROFF, R.; BERKES, E. G.; WEINBERG, B. A.; LANE, J.I. Women are credited less in science than men. Nature, v. 608, n. 7921, p. 135-145, aug., 2022. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04966-w. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
ROSS, Sheldon M. Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Academic Press, 2004.
SAITOVITCH, E. M. B.; LIMA, B. S.; BARBOSA, M. C. B. Mulheres na Física: uma análise quantitativa. In: SAITOVITCH, E. M. B.; FUNCHAL, R. Z.; BARBOSA, M. C. B.; PINHO, S. T. R. de; SANTANA, A. E. de (eds.). Mulheres na Física: casos históricos, panorama e perspectivas. São Paulo: Editora Livraria da Física, 2015. p. 245-259. Available at: http://www1.fisica.org.br/gt-genero/images/arquivos/Mulheres_Pioneiras_/livro-mulheres-na-fisica.pdf.
SANTOS MACHADO, L.; PERLIN, M.; COLLA SOLETTI, R.; KMETZCH ROSA E SILVA, L.; DOERDERLEIN SCHWARTZ, I. V.; SEIXAS, A.; KLEIN RICACHENEVSKY, F.; TAMAJUSUKU NEIS, A.; STANISCUASKI, F. Parent in Science: The impact of parenthood on the scientific career in Brazil. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 2ND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GENDER EQUALITY IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (GE), may, 2019. Anais […]. [S. l.: s. n.], may 2019. p. 37-40. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8819567. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
SAVIGNY, Heather. Cultural sexism and the UK Higher Education sector. Journal of Gender Studies, v. 28, n. 6, p. 661-673, aug., 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1597689. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
SAVIGNY, Heather. Women, know your limits: cultural sexism in academia. Gender and Education, v. 26, n. 7, p. 794-809, nov., 2014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.970977. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
SCHIEBINGER, Londa. Has feminism changed science?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
SERRANO, S. J. Women used to dominate computer science. So what happened?. 2017. Available at: https://www.sysgen.com.ph/articles/why-women-stopped-coding/27216. Accessed on: 30 oct. 2023.
SHEPHERD, S. Why are there so few female leaders in higher education: a case of structure or agency?. Management in Education, v. 31, n. 2, p. 82-87, apr., 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020617696631. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
STANISCUASKI, F.; KMETZSCH, L.; SOLETTI, R. C.; REICHERT, F.; ZANDONÀ, E.; LUDWIG, Z. M. C.; LIMA, E. F.; NEUMANN, A.; SCHWARTZ, I. V. D.; MELLO-CARPES, P. B.; TAMAJUSUKU, A. S. K.; WERNECK, F. P.; RICACHENEVSKY, F. K.; INFANGER, C.; SEIXAS, A.; STAATS, C. C.; DE OLIVEIRA, L. Gender, race and parenthood impact academic productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: from survey to action. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, 2021. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663252. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
STANISCUASKI, F.; MACHADO, A. V.; SOLETTI, R. C.; REICHERT, F.; ZANDONÀ, E.; MELLO-CARPES, P. B.; INFANGER, C.; LUDWIG, Z. M. C.; DE OLIVEIRA, L. B. against parents in science hits women harder. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-9, maio, 2023. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01722-x. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
TUKEY, J. W. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1977.
UN WOMEN. Everything you need to know about pushing for equal pay. 2020. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/9/explainer-everything-you-need-to-know-about-equal-pay. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
VALENTOVA, J. V.; OTTA, E.; SILVA, M. L.; MCELLIGOTT, A. G. Underrepresentation of women in the senior levels of Brazilian science. PeerJ, v. 5, p. e4000, dec. 2017. Available at: https://peerj.com/articles/4000. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P.; SANDSTRÖM, U. Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact. PLOS ONE, v. 12, n. 8, p. e0183301, aug, 2017. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0183301. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
VAN DEN BRINK, M.; BENSCHOP, Y. Slaying the seven-headed dragon: the quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work & Organization, v. 19, n. 1, p. 71-92, 2012. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
WALDMAN, L.; ABREU, A.; FAITH, B.; HRYNICK, T.; SÁNCHEZ DE MADARIAGA, I.; SPINI, L. Pathways to success: bringing a gender lens to the scientific leadership of global challenges. [S. l.]: GenderInSITE, 2018. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14324. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
WALLER, N. How men and women see the workplace differently. The Wall Street Journal, New York, sep., 2016. Available at: http://graphics.wsj.com/how-men-and-women-see-the-workplace-differently/. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
WIECZOREK-SZYMAŃSKA, A. Gender diversity in academic sector - case study. Administrative Sciences, v. 10, n. 3, p. 41, sep., 2020. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/3/41. Accessed on: 15 oct. 2023.
WILCOXON, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, v. 1, n. 6, p. 80, 1945. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3001968. Accessed on: 20 oct. 2023.
WOETZEL, J.; MADGAVKAR, A.; ELLINGRUD, K.; LABAYE, E.; DEVILLARD, S.; KUTCHER, E.; MANYIKA, J.; DOBBS, R.; KRISHNAN, M. How advancing women’s equality can add $12 trillion to global growth. New York: McKinsey Global Institute, 2015. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/how-advancing-womens-equality-can-add-12-trillion-to-global-growth.
YPO; FINANCIAL TIMES; HEFORSHE. A Global imperative: gender equality in the c-suite. [S. l.: s. n.], 2021. Available at: https://www.heforshe.org/en/solutions/global-imperative-gender-equality-c-suite. Accessed on: 14 oct. 2023.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##


Como Citar

NODARI, C.; OLIVEIRA, C. C. S. de; BARBOSA, M. C. Gender diversity in the deans of brazilian universities: career temporal evolution, production of knowledge and of human resources. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, [S. l.], v. 18, n. especial, p. 1–35, 2024. DOI: 10.21713/rbpg.v18iespecial.2015. Disponível em: https://rbpg.capes.gov.br/rbpg/article/view/2015. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2024.

Seção

Dossiê Temático

Publicado:

set. 27, 2024
Palavras-chave:

gender, women in higher education, glass ceiling, academic leadership inequity Gender, Women in higher education, Glass ceiling, Academic leadership inequity

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.