Management of secondary forests of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest for timber production: possible and desirable

Authors

  • Alfredo Celso Fantini Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Departamento de Fitotecnia
  • Alexandre Siminski Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Campus de Curitibanos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21713/2358-2332.2016.v13.1013

Keywords:

Succession. Native Species. Forest Management. Swidden Cultivation.

Abstract

The remnants of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest consist mainly of secondary forests with great potential for the production of all ecosystem services. However, contrary to the trend seen in other countries, the production of goods in these ecosystems is not stimulated, particularly the production of wood. In this article, we discuss this theme, arguing that secondary forests present high yield of good quality wood, which can generate important source of income to pay the soil rent, stimulating the appreciation for the forest and reversing the processes of its conversion into other land uses. We base our reasoning on the results of a research project on the management of secondary forests for sustainable timber production carried out in the State of Santa Catarina, which has generated original data on the ecology and yield of these forests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alfredo Celso Fantini, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Departamento de Fitotecnia

Ph.D. Forestry, University of Wisconsin - Madison (1999).

Professor da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Orientador no PPG Agroecossistemas - UFSC

Interesse de pesquisa: florestas secundárias, roça de toco.

Published

2017-03-10

How to Cite

FANTINI, A. C.; SIMINSKI, A. Management of secondary forests of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest for timber production: possible and desirable. Brazilian Journal of Graduate Studies, Brasília, DF, v. 13, n. 32, 2017. DOI: 10.21713/2358-2332.2016.v13.1013. Disponível em: https://rbpg.capes.gov.br/rbpg/article/view/1013. Acesso em: 29 oct. 2026.

Issue

Section

Debates
Received 2016-04-29
Accepted 2016-10-07
Published 2017-03-10

Most read articles by the same author(s)