FACULTY SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION PROFILE IN A FEDERAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN BRAZIL

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Abstract

Unusual practice in universities, knowing your scientific production can be useful for establishing institutional and national development strategies. Thus, sought to outline the profile of research and scientific production of the faculty of an institution frequently cited nationally and internationally for its academic quality, recognized, in 2017, as the 12th most productive in the whole country, but which presented low indices as to qualitative parameters of this production. A marked concentration of this scientific production in journals well classified on the Qualis basis, however as having a low impact factor was highlighted. This production due to a very small number of professors, in a universe in which a significant amount that was never mentioned by their peers or even managed to disseminate some scientific product in a vehicle indexed on international bases. Different variables of this scientific production and internal systems are showed for evaluation and functional progression in this institution. Also is highlighted how an inappropriate use of a tool to evaluate graduate programs negatively interfered in the quality of all scientific production and management of this institution, as well as in the formation of future masters and doctors. Concluding by the adequacy of evaluations of this nature in institutions of higher education in Brazil, are listed for reflection measures that could be implemented in order to increase the scientific quality of this scientific production, as well as to rationalize the use of public resources for these institutions destined, based on an intrinsic and continuous scientific knowledge management process.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Autores
  • Cláudio Mafra
Biografia
Referências

Abramo, G., Ciriaco, T. C., D’Angelo, A. Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender? Journal of Informetrics, v. 9, n.1, p. 25-38. 2015.
Barata, R. B. Dez coisas que você deveria saber sobre o Qualis. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, v. 13, n. 30. 2016.
Barata, R. B. Necessary changes in the evaluation of graduate programs in Brazil. Interface, v. 23. 2019.
Chou, O. N. A comparison study of impact factor in Web of Science and Scopus databases for engineering education and educational technology journals. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, v. 9, p. 187-194. 2012.
CouraI, J. R., Willcox, L. C. B. Impact factor, scientific production and quality of Brazilian medical journals. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, v. 98, n. 3, p. 293-297. 2003.
Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Fioravanti, M. C. S., Bini, L. M., Rangel, T. F. Drivers of academic performance in a Brazilian university under a government-restructuring program. Journal of Informetrics, v. 14, n. 3. 2016.
Freitas, M. H. A. Avaliação da produção científica: considerações sobre alguns critérios. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, v. 2, n. 3. 1998.
Galembeck, F. Sem avaliações, sem progresso. Ciência e Cultura, v. 42, n. 9, p. 627-628. 1990.
Gènova, G., Astudillo, H. & Fraga, A. The scientometric bubble considered harmful. Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 22, p. 227-235. 2016.
Gómez-Sancho, J. M. & Mancebón-Torrubia, M. J. The evaluation of scientific production: Towards a neutral impact factor. Scientometrics, v. 81, p. 435. 2009.
Joshi, A. Comparison between Scopus and ISI Web of Science. Journal Global Values, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1-11. 2016.
Kamdem, J. P., Roos, D. H., Sanmi, A. A., Calabró, L., Abolaji, A. O., Oliveira, C. S., Barros, L. M., Duarte, A. E., Barbosa, N. V., Souza, D. O., Rocha, J. B. T. Productivity of CNPq researchers from different fields in biomedical sciences: The need for objective bibliometric parameters — A report from Brazil. Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 25, p. 1037-1055. 2019.
Martelli, D. R., Oliveira, M. C. L., Pinheiro, S. V., Santos, M. L., Dias, V., Silva, A. C. S., Martelli-Júnior, H., Oliveira, E. A. Profile and scientific output of researchers recipients of CNPq productivity grant in the field of medicine. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, v. 65, n. 5, p. 682-690. 2019.
Moschkovich, M., Almeida, A. M. F. Desigualdades de gênero na carreira acadêmica no Brasil. Dados, v. 58, n. 3, p. 749-789. 2015.
Moss-Racusin, C.A., Dovidio, J.F., Brescoll, V.L., Graham, M.J., Handelsman, J. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,v. 109, n. 41, p. 16474-16479. 2012.
Orsi, C. Europa debate modelos de gestão universitária. Revista Ensino Superior Unicamp, v. 5, p. 12-17. 2012.
Perlin, M. S., Santos, A. A. P., Imasato, T., Borenstein, D., Da Silva, S. The Brazilian scientific output published in journals: A study based on a large CV database. Journal of Informetrics, v. 11, n. 1, p. 18-31. 2017.
Picinin, C. T., Pilatti, L. A., Kovaleski, J. L., Graeml, A. R., Pedroso, B. Comparison of performance of researchers recipients of CNPq productivity grants in the field of Brazilian production engineering. Scientometrics, v. 109, p. 855-870. 2016.
Pontes, P. Brazilian scientific production vs. innovation and technology. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, v. 81, n. 4, p. 343-344. 2015.
Rays, O. A. Ensino-Pesquisa-Extensão: notas para pensar a indissociabilidade. Revista Cadernos de Educação Especial, v. 21, p. 71-85. 2003.
Rowe, D. E. O., Bastos, A. V. B. Links between career and academic performance: comparing teachers at private and public higher education establishements in Brazil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 14, n. 6, p. 1011-1030. 2010.
Santos, L R., Rabelo, D. M. R. S. Produção científica: Avaliação, ferramentas e indicadores de qualidade. Ponto de Acesso, v. 11, n. 2, p. 3-33. 2017.
Silaghi-Dumitrescu, R., Sabau, A. Scientometric analysis of relative performance in a key university in Romania. Scientometrics, v. 99, p. 463-474. 2014.
Souza, L. E. P. F. O desafio da avaliação da produção científica. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 29, n. 9, p. 1707-1730. 2013.
Strehl, L., Calabró, L., Souza, D. O., Amaral, L. Brazilian science between national and foreign journals: Methodology for analyzing the production and impact in emerging scientific communities. PloS ONE, v. 11, n. 5, e0155148. 2016.
Turri, M. Università in transizione: governança, struttura economica e valutazione. Milano: Guerini e Associati. 191 pp. 2011.
Torrisi, B. A multidimensional approach to academic productivity. Scientometrics, v. 99, p. 755-783. 2014.
Zainab, A.N. Personal, academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: a review of literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, v. 4, n. 2, p. 73-110. 1999.
Zawislak, P. A., Dalmarco, G. The silent run: New issues and outcomes for university-industry relations in Brazil. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 6, n. 2, p. 66-82. 2011.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##


How to Cite

MAFRA, C. FACULTY SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION PROFILE IN A FEDERAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN BRAZIL. Brazilian Journal of Graduate Studies, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 36, p. 1–43, 2020. DOI: 10.21713/rbpg.v16i36.1689. Disponível em: https://rbpg.capes.gov.br/rbpg/article/view/1689. Acesso em: 22 dec. 2024.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 36 (2020): v. 16 n. 36 (2020)

Section

Studies

Published:

Nov 2, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21713/rbpg.v16i36.1689
Keywords:

Analysis of the scientific productivity. Knowledge management. Academic productivity parameters. Research productivity. Scientometrics. Análisis de la investigación científica. Administración del conocimiento. Parámetros de la investigación académica. Productividad de la investigación. Scientometry. Análise da produtividade científica. Gestão do conhecimento. Parâmetros da produtividade acadêmica. Produtividade da pesquisa. Cientometria.