The National Program of Academic Cooperation – PROCAD in the view of the project evaluators

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Abstract

This article had the purpose of presenting and analyzing the perceptions, criticisms and suggestions of the consultants who participated of the evaluation processes of the National Program of Academic Cooperation (PROCAD), considering both the submission of proposals and the mid-term evaluation of ongoing projects in an effort to contribute to the improvement of the program. The qualitative and quantitative research was carried out through consultation by email, sent to members of the Evaluation Committee of PROCAD projects. The questionnaire consisted of 15 items of a qualitative nature, covering 13 closed and two open questions relating to the aims and characteristics of the program. Based on this study, it can be understood that the institutionalization of a system of ongoing evaluation for PROCAD could contribute to the improvement of the program and to the creation of new initiatives aimed at developing graduate study. The implementation of the measures suggested here would also provide for the improvement to PROCAD.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Autores
  • Elci Vieira de Moura Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
  • Ivan Rocha Neto Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Biografia
Elci Vieira de Moura, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Mestre, Ciências Ambientais (Política e Gestão em Ciência e Tecnologia), Universidade de Brasília - Unb, Doutoranda em Educação em Ciências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) e Analista em Ciência e Tecnologia, CAPES.
Ivan Rocha Neto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Doutor, Eletrônica, University of Kent at Canterbury (Reino Unido), docente colaborador da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS).
Referências

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##


How to Cite

MOURA, E. V. de; ROCHA NETO, I. The National Program of Academic Cooperation – PROCAD in the view of the project evaluators. Brazilian Journal of Graduate Studies, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 29, 2016. DOI: 10.21713/2358-2332.2015.v12.846. Disponível em: https://rbpg.capes.gov.br/rbpg/article/view/846. Acesso em: 19 may. 2024.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 29 (2015)

Section

Studies

Published:

Jun 6, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21713/2358-2332.2015.v12.846
Keywords:

Avaliação. Capes. Cooperação Acadêmica. Procad. Assessment. CAPES. Academic Cooperation. PROCAD. Evaluación. CAPES. Cooperación Académica. PROCAD.